North Korea claims that US military operations against Iran and Israeli attacks constitute "illegal aggression."

The statement stated that the "war of aggression" between Israel and the United States is unacceptable in any situation.

It further stated that restoring peace and security in the Middle East should be the responsibility of regional nations and others with similar interests.

After its air force carried out a massive operation that killed Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Israel's military stated on Sunday that it had launched a sweeping wave of attacks on the center of Tehran, stoking concerns of widespread unrest in the Middle East.

The statement further declared that restoring peace and ensuring security in the region should primarily be the responsibility of Middle Eastern nations themselves, along with other countries that share common interests in stability. It emphasized that outside interference only deepens divisions and heightens the risk of broader war.

Israel’s military confirmed that its air force carried out what it described as a massive and coordinated operation targeting central Tehran. In a dramatic development, Israeli officials stated that the operation resulted in the death of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The announcement, if fully verified, marks a historic and deeply consequential turning point in regional geopolitics.

The reported killing of Khamenei has intensified fears of widespread unrest not only within Iran but across the broader Middle East. Analysts warn that such a high-profile assassination could provoke retaliatory measures from Iranian forces or allied groups in neighboring countries, potentially drawing additional global powers into the conflict.

While Washington has not publicly detailed the full extent of its involvement, U.S. officials have framed the strikes as necessary defensive measures aimed at neutralizing perceived threats. However, critics argue that the coordinated actions with Israel represent a significant escalation and risk triggering a cycle of retaliation.

North Korea’s response aligns with its historically adversarial stance toward both Washington and its regional allies. Pyongyang has frequently condemned joint U.S.-Israeli military initiatives, often portraying them as examples of unilateralism and disregard for international norms. Observers note that North Korea’s statement may also serve to strengthen its diplomatic ties with Iran, with whom it has maintained cooperative relations in various sectors over the years.

The developments have drawn widespread international attention. Governments across Asia, Europe, and the Middle East are closely monitoring the situation, urging restraint and calling for diplomatic solutions. Concerns are mounting over potential disruptions to global energy supplies, as instability in Iran could directly affect oil markets and international trade routes.

Humanitarian organizations have also expressed alarm over civilian safety in Tehran and other targeted areas. Urban airstrikes pose significant risks to non-combatants, and there are growing fears of displacement should the conflict intensify. Aid agencies are preparing contingency plans in case large-scale humanitarian assistance becomes necessary.

The broader geopolitical implications remain uncertain. Some analysts believe the strikes could reshape power dynamics in the Middle East, while others warn that removing a central figure like Khamenei may create a power vacuum inside Iran, leading to internal political turbulence.

Despite the heated rhetoric from Pyongyang, diplomatic observers suggest that North Korea’s condemnation is unlikely to translate into direct involvement. Instead, it serves as a pointed reminder of the deep divisions that characterize global politics, particularly when it comes to questions of military intervention and sovereignty.

As tensions continue to rise, calls for de-escalation are growing louder. Whether through regional dialogue, international mediation, or multilateral negotiations, many leaders stress the urgent need to prevent further deterioration of security conditions. For now, the Middle East stands at a precarious crossroads, with the potential consequences of the strikes still unfolding on both regional and global stages.